Diphtheria Scare in Edo State: Calls for School Closure Amid Rising Cases

In a major legal breakthrough, a UK High Court has ruled against oil giant Shell in a case involving large-scale oil pollution in Nigeria’s Niger Delta. The judgment, delivered on June 20, 2025, represents a significant step forward for the Bille and Ogale communities, who have battled for years to hold Shell accountable for decades of environmental damage.
The court firmly rejected Shell’s claim that the case was invalid due to Nigeria’s five-year legal time limit. It ruled that the continued presence of pollution in the affected areas constitutes a “continuing nuisance,” meaning the communities can still seek justice even if the original oil spills occurred long ago. This decision sets an important legal precedent that could impact future environmental cases.
Importantly, the court also dismissed Shell’s argument that it could not be held responsible for oil spills caused by third-party sabotage. The judge noted that Shell may still be liable if it failed to take adequate steps to prevent such sabotage or if its employees were involved in illegal activities. This broadens the scope of Shell’s accountability and reinforces the company's duty of care in protecting communities where it operates.
Another major aspect of the ruling is that both Shell plc (the UK-based parent company) and its former Nigerian subsidiary—now operated by Renaissance Africa Energy—can face trial in the UK. This builds on the precedent set in the 2021 Okpabi v. Shell case, allowing foreign victims to sue parent companies for environmental harm caused by their subsidiaries.
Human rights organizations and environmental activists have praised the ruling as a long-awaited victory for justice. A full trial is expected in 2027, where Shell may be ordered to carry out a full environmental clean-up and pay compensation.
This ruling gives new hope to affected communities and strengthens global efforts to hold multinational corporations accountable.
Comments