National Assembly Moves to Create New State in South-East: Hope Renewed for Equity and Representation
The Nigerian Presidency has responded sharply to comments credited to former United States President Donald Trump, who recently accused the Tinubu administration of permitting the persecution of Christians in Nigeria.
In an official statement released on Sunday, the Presidency described Trump’s outburst as part of “an orchestrated game unfolding in America” and insisted that President Bola Ahmed Tinubu is “well ahead” of any such political manoeuvres.
According to presidential spokesperson Ajuri Ngelale, the government views Trump’s recent speech — where he hinted at possible sanctions or military action against Nigeria — as a political move driven by misinformation and foreign interest groups rather than credible evidence.
“President Tinubu remains focused on securing Nigeria’s unity, promoting economic recovery, and ensuring the protection of all citizens irrespective of faith,” Ngelale said.
Former U.S. President Donald Trump made global headlines last week when he accused Nigeria’s government of “tolerating genocide against Christians.”
His comment came during a rally in Texas where he pledged to “hold African leaders accountable” if re-elected, claiming his administration had ignored “mass killings” during his previous term.
Trump’s remarks quickly drew international criticism, with Nigerian officials dismissing the allegations as “reckless and unfounded.” Religious leaders and civic groups have also warned against the possible diplomatic tension it could create between both nations.
In its response, the Nigerian government accused Trump and his supporters of spreading dangerous misinformation about Nigeria’s internal affairs.
The statement added that Tinubu is “not distracted” and remains “ahead of orchestrated games being played in America,” referring to Trump’s controversial bid to return to power.
“Nigeria will continue to engage with all global powers constructively,” the Presidency said.
“But we will not allow fearmongering or misinformation to dictate our national policies.”
The presidency emphasised that Tinubu’s administration has taken concrete steps to improve national security, citing the recent restructuring of military leadership and ongoing dialogue with community leaders in volatile regions.
The comments have triggered wide responses both within and outside Nigeria.
The U.S. War Department, however, maintained that it is “monitoring reports” of violence in northern Nigeria but denied any immediate plan for military action.
This exchange signals growing diplomatic tension between Nigeria and the United States.
Observers note that Tinubu’s upcoming visit to Washington — where he is expected to meet U.S. Vice President J.D. Vance — could determine how both nations move forward.
Political analysts warn that the “genocide” narrative could hurt Nigeria’s global image, especially if not managed carefully.
Still, some argue that Trump’s comments were politically motivated, aimed at winning over Christian voters ahead of the 2026 U.S. elections.
For President Tinubu, this is a crucial moment to assert Nigeria’s independence while maintaining vital international partnerships.
Diplomatic experts urge the government to adopt a balanced tone — defending Nigeria’s sovereignty without escalating hostility.
From a media standpoint, this story exposes how international politics can shape local narratives.
For bloggers and journalists, it’s an opportunity to explore:
The controversy also offers a reminder that social media can amplify misinformation, sometimes faster than governments can respond.
As of today, President Tinubu remains firm that Nigeria’s sovereignty “is not up for debate.”
While his team prepares for the upcoming U.S. visit, Nigerians are watching closely to see whether this diplomatic rift will cool down — or ignite a new chapter in Nigeria-U.S. relations.
Whatever happens next, one thing is clear: Nigeria’s foreign policy will now be tested not just in global forums, but also in the fierce world of international media narratives.
Comments